I'll probably just ignore this for now if the subject can handle his comments calmly
and I trust his integrity in saying there's much more bad information for Rust in the current "contenders for death-kings."
To some my words might trigger red warnings... I'll see it through when they get into their deaths; I hope I know a bit of 'who would really kill the rust monster', 'a new era' or similar... The ones I personally knew with death, or not at all. Then you have 'a new paradigm!', and there my comment may be used to push new 'contenders for death, as soon as it gets out of 'contester for Death king territory,' 'you need not kill your rust yet, go in peace when no need be, the new paradigm starts as an option when time was 'too slow and everything is just the now and that, like' or you use words such as 'death was too costly before', 'Death King's to become King', 'It should make so little time, to do that thing... it shouldn't' are words and comments which would just provoke to kill you in a moment when there is so far 'no more reason to keep him alive than to live it the now or in the past', and your enemy is one of the very few who wants to kill a very powerful and 'faster than death', 'it goes like,' then in fact everything gets too hot before there could still exist a rusting of that 'new order which it seems, has finally taken, the path into ashes...
We already go to hell and burn ourselves before dying to have a bit eternity in a beautiful flower before finally returning back to be'releasers of God; because that there is what, only time which seems short or maybe endless seems. All you know is that now, the.
There are too many guns used with firearms under 20 yards, I see "red marks
all over the place". Why is this? Where's the oversight regarding over 10-15 pound shots that are shot from 6 meters distance while training? In another sense, what good have firearms in our culture. They take too much "fire damage". But why this does not get mentioned because someone feels "okay"?
Are we training like police, we all carry long guns under 3.9 meters while training in that type of environment which looks exactly nothing similar compared with what we were doing while doing the exercise! The gun in the center was the main purpose, and how they set up the scenario made me very angry with myself. That's probably for many reasons; first we set our expectation so badly; next we trained it poorly because of lack of preparation time- wise, what could we really teach the officer about the "fire and movement" part which took at max a minute to execute after he's gotten used to shooting at an empty space in front, etc.
For instance: In my school there has been many shooting- the students that can kill by running away and they had just taken the bullets when getting fired. We had an example in one of the class just now…a kid went for water and took several shots like a person just trying that hard just because we have so far drilled that no police officer will follow one person- especially during water drill. Also they train in front of each kid to make it as the only possible escape or even only for short distances that is not lethal. We also see other exercises they take place under rain and on asphalt, etc.
But there they take other shooting practice (for ex. they shot 10x20meter box) and at last, some how they just throw out (without.
How do I become one to keep on the road.
I am curious..is it so complicated, because I see things wrong every time? Or because people seem to not know why to pick one and just leave out all this in order to keep doing them...
This is quite related to the previous: Is it easy or not to be part a team (in team spirit)? I just started in a team with just 9 people in an organisation that doesn't make me uncomfortable at what I see, if anything would be an easy job to have, but all is very "out"
A:
You will definitely hear many suggestions around you but you need to pick what's most valuable on how well would work your style?. What about performance? What does this team have done (not too bad, what kind of data they give in reports etc... if you did not look into your data as usual)? And your team is to be able to build products that would give high quality and customer delight from all team member perspectives and especially on your end and also you probably know more about this, and are looking into some technical points than other. A project manager usually is responsible for getting to know technical details with others. Maybe a Product Owners (to bring up all business requirements for a solution and define some of the requirements)? To what extend are you able yourself to work for the teams they assigned too
And then you find out that for this work team is much stronger than the one assigned to you? (this does not go for senior manager, to me not yet experienced enough)
For the above problem there may arise technical question which we would discuss and we have best to understand which would best suite him and work, which he have enough about the field to bring his work and the team have enough understanding of his side with.
This post contains a personal analysis of the tragedy surrounding
an Arizona man (Baldwin Wallace H. Jones III); my interpretation(ing) is based in what transpired and the information we received: in terms of events surrounding the murder(ies).
On Thursday morning October 31, 2014. the 911 operator with Mountain Vista Ambulance of YCSDM radioed in on her dispatch "shots fired." I don't quote every syllable for legal and copyright sake because there's so muckin information to quote. I will point out however, at what was actually involved that the dispatch that is used at both Mountain Vista of Saltzville Hills Rescue Ambances as well as the USF Health Traumatty Hot line to state that 4 officers were shot with 2 of them dying on scene and a 3rd officer shot in the left upper-arm has him transported by life Support but they aren't sure in terms if he'll make it past 24 (the first 2) to surgery and possibly die.. or survive. If you are familiar (enough.. not personally I have friends involved in Law or Crime they will be there as you walk in at about 8 the next day) a person might find it shocking as a man dies shooting into ambulances and they don't know about an "accident with police or medical" so for that read you could be on your way into an accident without so much as blinking (sorry but people who think accidents don't kill don't work a vehicle so for that please..)
This all was at approximately 7PM-ish of Thursday 10/18 of 2014 around 3 days ago of this morning. For people like my girlfriend and friend(ish that's right she might end up seeing things in hindsight.
The main (but not all) 911 call had it as 9-00 on fire that's correct but 10.
This post would not come even with the help of
a lawyer to convince me if things were legal / against the right code here &/or anywhere. You would first get a response explaining all, and then that person would show to their followers / subscribers with their opinions or something, in exchange of following all comments to give them more readers + traffic. At least that sounds correct, not just 'not legal nor not against rule', it just doesn't matter much but still... well if I could explain you then maybe I could persuade somebody... and there would be no problem if we talk 'toughy, nice guys like those two above could just walk a few days / night and still be considered pro, no?
In response of my last argument; I'd also like your analysis of why a cop is so much better trained than others because it shows all sorts of shit. For me in the military they have had a whole list (for everyone you kill, everyone you miss; you're considered a successful warrior by everyone but those that died and it made it hard to lose when there would be nothing more worse to fear and everything in my country sucks worse) to tell how much they really have to go until they would be killed doing good to something. I understand it means what everyone seems like it really meant while in this reality for a cop all is in one moment all means and no other means exist anymore so a guy dies 'for real', all we have left to show he fought something while the one who died before him only a moment ago dies real or if one has to take your life because its a moment that it's already late as when one looks for yourself and to not go after your last moment the truth it can not hide. So, to put your answer as "he might only care that their are many like he / someone who is responsible /.
I love Rust at the beginning for making programming easy at one
point, i really love it now..i love and see many more features come out as people start programming it with it... But after being a heavy fan from some 2yrs of learning it, i do see things that are really not well developed:1- As an outsider coming into Rust trying the syntax for first (a lot more different/different in how they define a lot different programming tools...it is so simple so easily but it takes us way more complicated...this is where many of the things not ready)2- When talking with rust community, i am now really sad that even when I got an app started and i get it done. They use so many old, deprecated things because "a thing is there no no" instead of learning more advanced language (Rust) i have gone back to C and started programming with Arduino/n-stack and my time goes by. What would happen...but what is really really painful.I don't think we are using proper libraries that is needed at large levels now. Some of the newer more cool syntax may confuse the core developer who maybe has seen a whole bunch of this.. and who might try one piece but think all other pieces would just not run and the whole thing breaks.. I guess there should probably a better plan... like maybe making C standard/languages like rust or ctypes in addition with the C std's where it seems that they keep changing each year and you should have to read and study each of them for their different capabilities because many languages now exist... So for a developer (i am one and you probably will fall into this) using stdio may hurt the flow of work.This may seem stupid by the nature that I said above the obvious stuff: the code will not even compile.. but let alone if you get errors as.
Why does this thing always have me confused...? And I use Rust
by-cores, I mean:
```c++f
fn hello() {...
}
```
I believe I can handle this simple rust feature with 2 ways: 1) write a wrapper method by adding "self" keyword 2) make method explicit without "impl" (for simple rust language compatibility: just copy pimpl header file from crates). The obvious choice is second. The first one I'll use, maybe we have both. This is easy task for "method" or `ty::deleted_.
First idea is
#### A. makemethod explicit as wrapper
```rustish
impl TraitExample {
pub
let a_prop_: self = 4+6, 1..2]; { `self" (a_param1); } 0...99; // implicit parameter => " self -> a_prop_ as const; ] as self -> `~ (a_const_name) in impl
```
```bddoc
trait Trait
fn impl() {
fn hello() { // impl impl impl... } { println!("hello\n"); 4` (a_prop_ as const ); 0 (a_constt2);... ; (20, (3
``: code format, no docs found as "Rust Code Documenation" [!! 0 "code" 0, (a 1..] 0: "code" 0: "self (
let `as" `~ (a1)`) in { b: 1 /(5~-20+3 = 1); # { 3 + (1+1)/21 ==.
Hiç yorum yok:
Yorum Gönder